Guides · Feedback

Whole-class feedback: a practical guide

Whole-class feedback replaces thirty individual comments with one well-planned lesson. Done well, it is faster to produce and more useful to students. Done badly, it is a slide of generic targets nobody acts on. This is the version that works.

Updated 9 October 2026 · 7 min read

Why it works

Individual written comments have two problems. They are slow to write, and much of what they say is repeated across the set: "explain your evidence", "answer the question in your first line", "this paragraph needs a point". Writing the same idea thirty times does not make it thirty times more useful.

Whole-class feedback says each common point once, properly, with an example and a chance to practise. The time you save on writing goes into planning the lesson where students act on it, which is the part that actually changes the next piece of work.

Step 1: Read with a notes sheet, not a pen

Read the set with one sheet of paper beside you, divided into four boxes:

You still need to decide a mark for each script if the task carries one. The difference is that you are not writing an essay back to each student while you do it.

Step 2: Pick three things, not ten

By the end of the set the errors box will be full. Choose the two or three issues that affected the most students and that will make the biggest difference to the next piece. Everything else can wait. A feedback lesson that tries to fix ten things fixes none of them.

Step 3: Build a one-page sheet

The sheet students receive should fit on one side and contain:

• What went well, illustrated with one or two real extracts from the class's own work (anonymised if you prefer).
• The two or three things to fix, each with a short explanation and a model showing the fix.
• A task for each fix: rewrite this paragraph, improve this sentence, add the missing step.
• Common spelling or terminology errors, listed once.

Real extracts from the class are far more persuasive than a textbook model. Students can see that someone in the room did it, which makes it seem possible.

Step 4: Run the lesson

A feedback lesson usually takes twenty to forty minutes:

1. Show a strong extract and ask the class what makes it work.
2. Teach the first fix with a worked model: a weak sentence, improved live.
3. Students apply it to their own work, in a different colour so the change is visible.
4. Repeat for the second and third fixes.
5. Check a sample as you circulate, and spend time with the students from your "individuals" box.

The redrafting step is not optional. Without it, whole-class feedback is a lecture about other people's mistakes.

Where individual feedback still matters

Whole-class feedback handles the common pattern. It does not handle the student whose essay is off in a way nobody else's is: the strongest writer who needs stretching, the student writing in a second language whose argument is better than their prose, the one who misread the question entirely. Those students need a sentence or a conversation of their own, and the time saved elsewhere is what makes that possible.

Students also generally want to know their own mark and, where relevant, their own target. A short individual line plus the whole-class sheet is a common and effective combination.

Common mistakes

• Targets that are labels, not actions. "Develop your analysis" names a problem. "Add a sentence explaining how the quote proves your point" tells a student what to do.
• No follow-up task. If students do not change anything, the feedback did not happen.
• Too long after the work. Feedback on an essay written three weeks ago is feedback on a stranger's essay. Aim for the next lesson or the one after.
• Only showing errors. Students learn as much from seeing what good looks like in their own class.

Using AI marking to plan whole-class feedback

The slowest part of whole-class feedback is the first step: reading the set closely enough to spot the patterns. A marking tool that proposes a mark and quotes each student's own words against your scheme puts the patterns in front of you quickly. You still read and approve every mark, but you can see which criterion most of the class fell down on before you sit down to plan.

Paddle works this way. You paste your scheme, share one link, and review the proposed marks with the evidence quoted from each script. Once you have published, you have both the individual marks and a view of the class, in time for the next lesson.

Common questions